I favour regulation that tries to minimise that outsize influence. One elector one vote and all that. Hence trying to limit opportunity for professional and fu

I favour regulation that tries to minimise that outsize influence. One elector one vote and all that. Hence trying to limit opportunity for professional and full time lobbyists, the permanent presence near to government constantly trying to influence, create and ruin policy. Sure, the CEO is probably only ever going to sign rather than write, and their money will always bring extra influence. I'd hope to find a balance that keeps it transparent but minimises gaming the system with money. As is, lobbying is bending most governments around the world badly out of shape, and seems to have got far out of hand. Of course getting a better system, whatever it may be, through the current system is another matter entirely... :)