Well, it might be preferable to protecting only the super-rich. :) but, just as seriously, it's not clear that we actually value anonymous property ownership w

Well, it might be preferable to protecting only the super-rich. :) but, just as seriously, it's not clear that we actually value anonymous property ownership when it has serious repercussions for our tax base and things like holding properties vacant. (See Vancouver). It's just another place that we have to walk a careful line between individual rights and not causing huge social problems.