3 ms·
Hold up. The theory (and practice) is that interpreters are superior for code that is only ever executed once, as you don't pay the [relatively high] cost of op
by zamalek 7y ago
Hold up. The theory (and practice) is that interpreters are superior for code that is only ever executed once, as you don't pay the [relatively high] cost of optimization for a single execution.
Unless the most trivial possible JIT is used (one that doesn't optimize at all)?
- comex 7y agoC++ constexpr functions can contain loops and recursion, or just be invoked from multiple locations, leading to the same code being executed more than once.