Sorry I've tried to reread your comment several times but I don't understand the point you're making. Why should people be okay with unlimited expenditures by

Sorry I've tried to reread your comment several times but I don't understand the point you're making. Why should people be okay with unlimited expenditures by corporations and special interest groups? Having your government's influence be heavily skewed towards companies or even any non inclusive group of individuals seems like a huge problem. I understand that there is a balance to be struck but the current one seems way off to me. > Then thrown in all the PACs they have friends and family in, all of which are protected by wonderfully named laws to protect the integrity of elections but really do only two things, protect incumbents and provide a legal means to make their friends and families rich. Isn't the ability of PACs to hand out so much money a consequence of Citizens United?