17 ms·
It occurred to me that flowers are like the virtue signaling of plants. If it flowers people are apt to think it's deliberate. If it's merely green, who knows..
by ianbicking 7y ago
It occurred to me that flowers are like the virtue signaling of plants. If it flowers people are apt to think it's deliberate. If it's merely green, who knows... is it the product of deliberate effort or just laziness? (Is a natural forest the product of laziness?) The orange daylily (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hemerocallis_fulva https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hemerocallis_fulva) is a way to cheat this system, you can be incredibly lazy but they do technically flower.
I read a survey somewhere that modern expectations now are that if you have 25% (some places 15%) of your yard as turf your neighbors will be happy. 0% indicates you aren't "doing" something, just letting things grow.
One option not really mentioned in the article is to just let things grow, and only weed out annoying things (small trees poorly placed, things with thorns or bristles, etc). Not mentioned of course because you'll get in trouble even outside of a HOA.
I'll admit, as much as I want to be (and I think I am) tolerant, I do have a dislike of weedy tree overgrowth. A neighbor is dedicated to doing no lawn maintenance, and the result is not particularly lush or interesting, just a ground layer that's relatively bare beneath small trees and bushes that are all competing. If they avoided that, and had primarily vascular plants, I think the result would be more lush, representing a better natural landscape.
There's a kind of design challenge here that I don't know quite how to solve. Lawns are genuinely usable in a way that I appreciate. A more trendy approach is to add a bunch of hardscape or deck and then plant the rest... is that really better? Or, for instance, composting yard waste on-site helps support all the organisms that make use of that organic matter. People complain that it's also a great place for mice to nest. Which it is... and is that bad? I tend to change my mind when they try to come into the house in the fall. Overgrowth can be a hiding place and a safety concern. Of course lots of wildlife would like to hide, and so that very problem is also a feature. There's a challenge between having control and letting nature take its course... and neither is really right, and I believe good design goes beyond simple compromise.
I don't know... something I'd love to work on in my retirement.
- rdiddly 7y agoA place that sustained itself and produced useful materials/medicines etc. without anybody's "doing anything" would have been the ideal about 500 years ago in what is now the US. And it's a permaculture ideal more recently. There seems to be a streak of the Protestant work ethic running through this. Otherwise how could doing more work be a virtue? Well actually I thought of an answer: Lots of things that take a lot of effort are done for not much more reason than to show how much effort they take. Which in turn reflects positively (supposedly) on the person who did it, testifying to their possession of ample extra resources to do the difficult thing. But I would think that would only be truly relevant for mating purposes. Like "This guy plays guitar, whose mastery takes an intellect, skill and devotion of time and resources that would potentially be available to you and your offspring if you were to mate with him" type logic. But what does it mean in the suburban lawn belonging to a complete family?
- daniel-cussen 7y agoThe green lawn comes from trying to pretend you're still in England. Literally you can play golf on a random piece of land provided you mow it--the rainfall is just right for covering everything with grass.