2 ms·
That's wrong decision on a fundamental level. If you apply that principle consistently, then property doesn't exist.
by lone_haxx0r 7y ago
That's wrong decision on a fundamental level. If you apply that principle consistently, then property doesn't exist.
- Retra 7y agoProperty is no less a social construct than law is. That decision draws a spectrum between individual property and public property that is modulated by use; if you allow public use of your property, it will be regulated by the public, proportional to the degree at which you open the property to public use. Without doing this, the government only has the authority to guarantee your rights on government property, which would effectively be no different from granting complete sovereignty to private entities.