12 ms·
> Not every single page can benefit from SSL. huh?
by wnevets 7y ago
> Not every single page can benefit from SSL.
huh?
- opportune 7y agoYou don't need "SSL" (TLS, https, etc.) to serve static, uncontroversial content
- nickserv 7y agoWith Let's Encrypt you really have no reason not too though. And what's not controversial in one country may be in another.
- mqus 7y agoThat only covers the "encryption" part of SSL/TLS. If there is any incentive to fake your content (e.g. for phishing or other attacks, or even simply spreading false information), you'll also want the "authenticity" part of TLS for preventing middlemen from arbitrarily changing content.
- wnevets 7y agoThat's absolutely untrue. For example a man in the middle could intercept and modify the page. https://www.troyhunt.com/heres-why-your-static-website-needs-https/ https://www.troyhunt.com/heres-why-your-static-website-needs...
- opportune 7y agoThis was a good article, I concede the point.