2 ms·
> Some friends and I would link to files that didn't set content length and would feed them data forever. That seems spectacularly unwise (or at least useless)
by kbenson 7y ago
> Some friends and I would link to files that didn't set content length and would feed them data forever.
That seems spectacularly unwise (or at least useless) for all but a minuscule portion of people. Either you stop feeding them data after a short while, and don't care, or you keep feeding them data, and I'm pretty sure Google cares less about (and pays less for) data transfer than you do.
Best case scenario you're trickling data to them and just keeping the connection open as long as possible. Even then, Google likely cares about one connection and the resources it takes far less than you do (even if you care little).
If it makes you feel better, it's maybe worth it, but it feels akin to carrying a marker with you so you can cross out Google's name in any newspaper you happen to be reading. It's an act of protest, but its impact leaves a lot to be desired.
- LinuxBender 7y agoIt totally made me feel better and they stopped connecting to my web servers. It just felt good to get a few cents of my tax money put to use. But yeah, in the grand scheme of things, they have infinite resources. I have been to two of their data-centers and they are massive.
- kbenson 7y agoWell, it's probably worth it then. It's hard to put a price on psychological well being, and if it helps you keep some sanity in this crazy world we're in, then power to you. And you get an interesting anecdote. :)