Yes, good point. As O'Neill pointed out in a blog post last year on "Efficiently Generating a Number in a Range" [1], the impact of choosing a faster PRNG is sm

Yes, good point. As O'Neill pointed out in a blog post last year on "Efficiently Generating a Number in a Range" [1], the impact of choosing a faster PRNG is smaller than the impact of choosing a good algorithm to generate an integer in a range. There'll be very few applications where choosing a faster PRNG has any significant impact. [1] http://www.pcg-random.org/posts/bounded-rands.html http://www.pcg-random.org/posts/bounded-rands.html