I do agree. It also sends the wrong signals. But try to understand the thinking for a moment: If no solution is applied at all because people are waiting for

I do agree. It also sends the wrong signals. But try to understand the thinking for a moment: If no solution is applied at all because people are waiting for the perfect one, there will be continued discrimination against competence. This has costs too. "Take no action" might not feel like a decision, but it is one and has ill effects. Is this better than trying a fix for a short period of time that may be mediocre, but is at least effective?