4 ms·
IMHO, this comes down to one thing. They lack the talent (and/or the will/resources to recruit it) to operate MySQL. I can TOTALLY get the reasoning behind sup
by avitzurel 7y ago
IMHO, this comes down to one thing. They lack the talent (and/or the will/resources to recruit it) to operate MySQL.
I can TOTALLY get the reasoning behind supporting only a single engine but the reasoning they write there are either wrong or misguiding.
- hmmIsee 7y agoThis comment is a baseless accusation if you do not provide more information on WHY you think the same.
- avitzurel 7y agoI realize my comment hit a sensitive spot but it's really not meant to be negative. It is 100% legit to give that up, it is 100% legit to go with the clear winner in your mind (it is the same in my mind too), but the technical reasoning is weak IMHO. if you wanted to support both, you can, but you clearly don't (and that's ok too).
- benatkin 7y agoOr they want to use that talent elsewhere. It's great that the simplicity argument doesn't really apply. It's a testament to developers getting better at programming in the large over the years. The database layer can be neatly abstracted away from the business rules.