I might be missing a detail here, but how is page 10 relevant to the validity of the premarital contract? The key argument seems to be page 4, which says that

I might be missing a detail here, but how is page 10 relevant to the validity of the premarital contract? The key argument seems to be page 4, which says that the lawyer of the wife had worked for Rubin in the past and filed a restraining order against the Rubin previous wife. The claim is that because of this the contract should be nullified because the wife did not have proper legal representation when she signed it. Seems pretty dull and fairly common court case where a judge will make a decision to either uphold or nullify a contract based on circumstances. Page 10 seems like a distraction because the contract did not have a "cheating clause", and regardless, the argument in the case is that the contract is invalid. If the contract is invalid then that relevance of slide 10 is unimportant, and if the contract is valid then the relevance of slide is also unimportant.