3 ms·
I think "try" is a terrible name, because it overloads try/catch which is very common usage these days but it's nothing like that. It's basically a error checki
by pfarnsworth 7y ago
I think "try" is a terrible name, because it overloads try/catch which is very common usage these days but it's nothing like that. It's basically a error checking macro, so give it a new name.
- Sphax 7y agoRust had the try! macro before which is similar, the name is fine I think.