11 ms·

> but he created the 201th repo (we had only paid for 200) That's an odd choice of a failure mode. > AWS still refunded all costs... Yeah they should. It was

> but he created the 201th repo (we had only paid for 200) That's an odd choice of a failure mode. > AWS still refunded all costs... Yeah they should. It was their silly design choice that lead to disclosure of secrets after all. What kind of failure mode is that even. Failing to create the repo would have led to a better user experience for sure. Can you imagine if S3 charged more for private objects and once you reach your count, it just makes them public and posts them on Reddit?

samstave 7y ago
>Can you imagine if S3 charged more for private objects and once you reach your count, it just makes them public and posts them on Reddit? Exactly! What a stupid design UX.
joncrane 7y ago
>It was their silly design choice that lead to disclosure of secrets after all. Wait, was the 200 private repos issue an AWS thing or a GitHub/GitLab/whatever thing? What AWS product has a concept of private/public repos and limits on how many of the former you can get for a certain price?
- samstave 7y ago
  It was a git thing. Never post aws secrets to git.