Wait, the markets? Don’t you mean the infrastructure? The financialized language in the article is very jarring. It’s like their readers can’t relate to base

Wait, the markets? Don’t you mean the infrastructure? The financialized language in the article is very jarring. It’s like their readers can’t relate to base reality anymore and the only way to connect with them is these financial terms, the “demand side and supply side”, “smart energy resources”, “multi period optimization”, and so on. Almost like you’re trying to describe a Ford Focus to them and you have to describe it as a “on demand relocation capital unit as a service” or something.