> You're right that it's more options, but it's also one more box a "competent JS dev" is expected to tick. Is that really true? React and/or Angular is someth

> You're right that it's more options, but it's also one more box a "competent JS dev" is expected to tick. Is that really true? React and/or Angular is something I would expect. If one uses anything more exotic then one should have a "they'll figure it out on the job" attitude. > But I also don't see why they couldn't have submitted a PR to react/angular/ember/meteor/vue. Do you honestly believe one can just leave a "here's a full static compiler for X" at the doorstep of these projects with some expectation of it actually being accepted? That would basically be an entirely separate program to be maintained alongside the runtime and any design considerations on either side will affect the other side.