4 ms·
I love how you conceptualise things based upon what seems to be your familiarity with DB cursors, stateful interfaces and other CS concepts. You're absolutely r
by sho 7y ago
I love how you conceptualise things based upon what seems to be your familiarity with DB cursors, stateful interfaces and other CS concepts. You're absolutely right, of course - it's just an interesting choice of conceptual frameworks to position your analogy within. I'm sure a non-programmer could also identify this property of cassettes as a medium, but they wouldn't be anywhere near as precise, nor use anything like that terminology...
I'm reminded of a character called Randy in a book called Cryptonomicon:
> To translate it into UNIX system administration terms (Randy's fundamental metaphor for just about everything)
I had a smile of recognition reading that, just like I had a smile of recognition reading yours. Stateful indeed. You might even term it a continuation.
- agumonkey 7y agoit's even more interesting to think that people designed these devices without this frame of reference
- alxlaz 7y agoThey didn't :-). The cursor -- a moving indicator, as part of a slide rule or any other similar instrument -- has been called that way since the early 17th century.
- agumonkey 7y agoit's not the name it's how and why it was on a tape
- lm28469 7y ago> how and why it was on a tape I think you're overthinking the whole thing, it's not really "on" a tape. It's the default operation of a tape, they didn't have to come up with the idea, it's a side effect of the medium. You need a motor to move the tape, no motor = no movement = the tape stays in its current position. To automatically rewind the tape you'd need some sort of mechanism under tension in it which would probably make it less reliable / more expensive.
- agumonkey 7y agothat's what I was hinting at. Did the designer really think about it or was it just naturally there.
- dboreham 7y agoThey didn't think about it.
- kd5bjo 7y agoWhat I really want to know is whether the fact that a standard pencil could be used to manually wind a cassette was an intended feature or a happy accident.
- johnnycab 7y agoI would wager it was the latter as Philips missed a trick in rebranding it as an accessory/dongle and monetising it. Now, if it was Apple..
- anticensor 7y agoI think it is intended.
- jalk 7y agoAnd there is an equal number of times where this ‘feature’ is(was) annoying. I.e rentable video tapes returns
- mc32 7y agoIndeed. A cassette was a miniaturization and interface improvement over reel to reel systems. So it inherited some of their properties but added new ones (like the protective case) and lost some properties (like splicing or adding and subtracting length of the medium)
- AstralStorm 7y agoYou can splice a cassette but it's relatively inconvenient. Adding time to the medium is limited by the capacity of the case.
- johnnycab 7y agoThis reminds of a comment, where someone never having used a typewriter before, commented that people in the olden days were prescient enough to put #(hashtag) on the keyboard, before Twitter was invented.
- cuu508 7y agoOr someone finding a floppy disk and saying – oh, that's cute, a 3D-printed Save icon!
- kgwgk 7y agoNote that “cursor” (Any part of a mathematical instrument that moves or slides backward and forward upon another part.) predates databases and computer interfaces.