3 ms·
It’s definitely a team effort, and management has to be remote first for (imho) any remote success. Too many places dip their toes in the water, but as a remot
by geerlingguy 7y ago
It’s definitely a team effort, and management has to be remote first for (imho) any remote success.
Too many places dip their toes in the water, but as a remote employee, I can sniff out immediately if a team is ‘backchanneling’ in the office, starting or ending meetings before/after the remote call is over, etc.
If the team is not remote-first, living and breathing with the sense that nothing should be isolated in a single physical location, it’s not going to be fun, especially for the remote workers.
It can sort of work in a sense where everyone gets together for some time, then everyone breaks off and does something, then they get back together.
But more often I see a team where 3 people are in the office, and 2 or 3 are remote—I’ve never seen this model be successful in the long run.
- davidjnelson 7y agoI’ve seen it work great. At Autodesk our team was half remote. People would come in at varying frequencies. Mostly for release planning.