4 ms·
There was "a misogynistic judgement of the female participant"? I missed it, but my misogymeter may be mis-aligned. [EDIT] no seriously where was it?
by asark 7y ago
There was "a misogynistic judgement of the female participant"? I missed it, but my misogymeter may be mis-aligned.
[EDIT] no seriously where was it?
- trilinearnz 7y agoI interpreted the "For God's sake" remark itself as possibly being a little sexist. Not necessarily in itself, but it's selection as the title of the article roused my concern a little.
- asark 7y agoOK, I follow. In context it didn't read that way to me, but maybe as a headline, sure. I actually thought that the section it came from was a fascinating example of heated but respectful discussion, illuminating of the relationship between the two, with the reader's sympathy leaning (just) in Margaret's favor but with remarkable restraint and compassion (and reason) on both sides, even when one or the other jabbed a little too hard—which is precisely when those qualities are tested, and are so precious. I'd hope that's why the title was chosen as it was. [EDIT] For the record, I didn't flag or downvote any of your comments. My condolences for the lost Internet points.