> When done properly, a function/method should be clear in terms of intent at the point of call. Yes, of course, but that (I claim) implies that the function/m

> When done properly, a function/method should be clear in terms of intent at the point of call. Yes, of course, but that (I claim) implies that the function/method has abstracted something. The parent was claiming that using indirection to hide code can be useful for readability, even when there is nothing being abstracted.