No I'm saying no law is above critical thinking. There should always be a devil's advocate because you should never be so convinced you're not the devil. But es

No I'm saying no law is above critical thinking. There should always be a devil's advocate because you should never be so convinced you're not the devil. But especially because I do think the legislative and judicial branches in the United States have effectively abdicated their responsibilities, and now we have executive branches that are given massive amounts of power, sheltered from the consequences of misconduct and given freedom from the responsibility to actually protect. So in practice yes I am suspicious that any law, badly implemented, is nothing but a tool for the powerful to wield more power with more supposed moral authority. edit: As a specific example, the only other non-dead comments I saw minutes after you posted this dealt with how this is different from existing parodies and the use of body-doubles in film. Is there a process formalizing consent from actors and actresses in such cases? There probably should be in the case of body double. But it would be an unreasonable expectation in the case of parody. But these are all questions that need to get answered before. Asking those questions and observing that they appear to not have been dealt with doesn't mean you think deepfake revenge porn is A-OK.