3 ms·
Shouldn't this already be covered by defamation and/or laws related to truth in marketing?
by mjevans 7y ago
Shouldn't this already be covered by defamation and/or laws related to truth in marketing?
- markdown 7y ago> laws related to truth in marketing I'm a regular joe consumer, and as far as I can tell, there are either no such laws, or they are never enforced.
- ThrustVectoring 7y agoYeah, this clearly counts as defamation in my opinion. It'd be difficult to prove damages, though, so it's unlikely to ever come to trial. Adding this as a category of per se defamation so that plaintiffs no longer need to prove economic harm from it seems like the natural solution to me.