4 ms·
A $300m Bootstrap Launched by a Teenager
- jamesaguilar 16y agoWait, it's worth $300M according to its owner. How much is it worth according to other people?
- AndrewWarner 16y agoTechCrunch and the British Telegraph both used the same $300M number. But I was clear in the post that my research lead me to believe that the number originally came from the founders. We'll never know for sure until they sell, but the achievement is impressive from everything I saw.
- doorty 16y agoA million isn't cool. You know what's cool? A billion dollars. I couldn't resist.
- doorty 16y agoReally? I got -4 points for this. My point is that $300 million isn't that big of deal when other teenager founders, a la Mark Zuckerburg, have multi-billion dollar corporations.
- chc 16y agoThe title of the HN post is a little bit confusing, at least for me. It's a company that was bootstrapped by an 18-year-old in 1997, which is now (13 years later) worth $300m according to its founder. The title here made me think it had been recently bootstrapped by somebody who is still a teenager and that it is now showing $300m in either revenue or profit.
- chunkbot 16y agoWhen someone says $300 million dollar company, it doesn't mean a company with $300 million dollars of revenue or profit per year. Generally, it means the valuation (based on any number of measures, ie. acquisition price, last traded price x number of shares outstanding, founders pulling a figure out of thin air, etc.) of the company, so revenue can be anywhere from $0 to $300+ million (generally around single-digit multiples), and profit can even be negative.
- qq66 16y agoThe traditional meaning of an $x billion company is by revenues. Using it to mean valuation is quite new, and limited to startup/Silicon Valley people.
- endtime 16y agoI'm pretty sure Wall St. people also talk in terms of valuation.
- krohrbaugh 16y agoIn general, Wall St tends to use this nomenclature (i.e., $X billion dollar company) when referencing revenues. For instance, Procter & Gamble is referred to as an "$80 billion dollar company" - which speaks to revenue, not market cap. This gets murky with private firms, since revenue isn't typically shared, and even more so with startups where so much of the value is based on future, projected earnings. In general, though, I'd say the nomenclature more commonly refers to revenues and not 'valuation'.
- deleted 16y ago[deleted]
- jonursenbach 16y agoIt'll be nice when we get to a point where we can stop supplementing stuff like this with "by a teenager". Who gives a crap as to how old they are?