4 ms·
Yes, though only on a single app -- a reasonably high-traffic content site. In this case, PyPy is roughly 10% faster (measured by comparing total view rendering
by jacobian 16y ago
Yes, though only on a single app -- a reasonably high-traffic content site. In this case, PyPy is roughly 10% faster (measured by comparing total view rendering time) but consumes about 2-3x as much RAM.
Edit: I should clarify: this site doesn't use a DB engine but instead is pulling and rending content from an XML DB over a REST API. See Alex's note below about DB performance for why this is an important point.
- victorg 16y agoI'm sure PyPY folks would love to know everything you can comfortably disclose about this use case :)
- xorglorb 16y ago> this site doesn't use a DB engine but instead is pulling and rending content from an XML DB over a REST API Just a random suggestion, but might it be easier (and less taxing) to have a background job pull the XML into a TMPFS (ramdisk) then update it every 5 minutes or so?