While, you were responding to nsajko, your example is useful for others (such as myself) who don’t know anything about the issue — other than this discussion. T

While, you were responding to nsajko, your example is useful for others (such as myself) who don’t know anything about the issue — other than this discussion. That example strikes me as being overly emotive. Its intent is to strongly disagree with the Arbitration Committee but the language and tone have the result of distracting from the substance of the disagreement – a classic case of “more heat than light”.