3 ms·
It's not elitism, not at least by the people who accurately describe it. It's for absolutely price-insensitive people who feel they need: 1) OSX 2) Top of the
by icelancer 7y ago
It's not elitism, not at least by the people who accurately describe it. It's for absolutely price-insensitive people who feel they need:
1) OSX
2) Top of the line specs
Anyone seriously buying a Mac Pro is either in the above group or just a crazed fanboy happy to pay the ludicrous premium to say they did.
- crispyambulance 7y agoI've got to admit, it has some "object appeal". I definitely would not dismiss the aesthetic aspect of it. On the other hand one has to wonder, however, if at some point around the same specs as the "low-end" mac pro, that a server wouldn't make more sense? Can you stuff a pro graphics card into a Dell R740 and have it far enough away that the fan roar won't be an issue when editing 4K video?
- icelancer 7y agoI mean, there's no "making sense" here. The minute anyone invokes "value" regarding this unit, it's a failed argument on both sides. Of course the Mac Pro is overpriced as hell and there is no way to extract actual value from this device. It is also very specifically not the point of it, which means it's like arguing about the value of a Bugatti. The Mac Pro is a luxury good and should be viewed as such. The fact that the tech community is up in arms about it because it's technically a computer is really their own fault for misclassifying the device.