Your figures are measuring different things. The lowtechmag link is for an off grid solar and battery combo. Off grid nuclear isn't a thing as far as I'm aware

Your figures are measuring different things. The lowtechmag link is for an off grid solar and battery combo. Off grid nuclear isn't a thing as far as I'm aware. Whereas the wikipedia link includes comparisons on all generating methods, which I would guess means they're an apples to apples comparison, so that means onshore wind in better than nuclear, offshore wind is as good as, and solar is only 5 times worse. And to restate the point in my last comment, the lowtechmag figures at least are based on a dirty grid, as the grid cleans up and the solar figures improve. Lets assume you get your way and we build out nuclear. Solar's figures will improve and eventually surpass those of nuclear. In that situation would you support moving over to solar?