3 ms·

Stop spouting this "even organelles need gravity" non-sense. Also: Going from quantum mechanics to classical mechanics is well understood as the limit ħ -> 0.

Stop spouting this "even organelles need gravity" non-sense. Also: Going from quantum mechanics to classical mechanics is well understood as the limit ħ -> 0. What we don't have a good handle on right now is the connection between gravity (as described by general relativity) and quantum mechanics.

soulofmischief 7y ago
Dawg you ought to read a bit more before denouncing that observation. Here's what I shared with another commenter: https://www.hindawi.com/journals/bmri/2015/863075/ https://www.hindawi.com/journals/bmri/2015/863075/ But there is plenty of literature on this. > What we don't have a good handle on right now is the connection between gravity (as described by general relativity) and quantum mechanics. So we are in agreement? The whole point of my post was just to highlight a particular curiosity of mine regarding the fact that we don't know how gravity and QM integrate. And sorry but we don't understand the full connection between QM and classical mechanics, or we wouldn't still be searching for a Grand Unified Theory. Kill the venom and see this for what it is: a simple scientific musing well within possibility which makes no claims toward any particular hypothesis. Instead of exploring the idea you brought your ego to the table and killed any chance at a useful dialogue between us.
- petschge 7y ago
  No useful thing can come from engaging the pointless rambling of somebody scientifically illiterate who doesn't understand that the connection between classical mechanics and QM is proven in every undergrad course on the subject and who thinks that his amateur blabbering using scientific words is the same thing as an interesting thought.
  - soulofmischief 7y ago
    That was extremely toxic. You don't know anything about my scientific prowess but you are revealing yourself to be quite the Negative Nancy. At no point was I blabbering about anything; I was musing from the start.

soulofmischief 7y ago

Dawg you ought to read a bit more before denouncing that observation. Here's what I shared with another commenter: https://www.hindawi.com/journals/bmri/2015/863075/ https://www.hindawi.com/journals/bmri/2015/863075/ But there is plenty of literature on this. > What we don't have a good handle on right now is the connection between gravity (as described by general relativity) and quantum mechanics. So we are in agreement? The whole point of my post was just to highlight a particular curiosity of mine regarding the fact that we don't know how gravity and QM integrate. And sorry but we don't understand the full connection between QM and classical mechanics, or we wouldn't still be searching for a Grand Unified Theory. Kill the venom and see this for what it is: a simple scientific musing well within possibility which makes no claims toward any particular hypothesis. Instead of exploring the idea you brought your ego to the table and killed any chance at a useful dialogue between us.

petschge 7y ago
No useful thing can come from engaging the pointless rambling of somebody scientifically illiterate who doesn't understand that the connection between classical mechanics and QM is proven in every undergrad course on the subject and who thinks that his amateur blabbering using scientific words is the same thing as an interesting thought.
- soulofmischief 7y ago
  That was extremely toxic. You don't know anything about my scientific prowess but you are revealing yourself to be quite the Negative Nancy. At no point was I blabbering about anything; I was musing from the start.