5 ms·
They did, sort of, starting in the 1940s. The tank make/model were replaced by arbitrary codes, but it was done sloppily and many of the tanks could be re-ident
by mattkrause 7y ago
They did, sort of, starting in the 1940s. The tank make/model were replaced by arbitrary codes, but it was done sloppily and many of the tanks could be re-identified. (See page 80 of the paper @dooglius posted above).
Still, the idea that this could leak valuable information is probably more obvious in hindsight, and sequential serial numbers do have some upsides. If there's a design flaw in one version of the gearboxes, you can just pull everything with a serial number between XXXX and YYYY. With randomized numbers, you'd have to maintain some master database, which is a lot harder when most of logging is done with pen-and-ink ledgers, carbon copies, and maybe punchcards.
- tyingq 7y agoThey could just randomly skip some numbers. That would maintain the XXX to YYY advantage.
- Johnny555 7y agoDoes that resolve the problem, or just add another variable to the analysis?
- mattkrause 7y agoNaively, it would inflate the absolute values, but you might be able to correct for it in various ways. Still, knowing that tank production fell 50% is probably useful, even if you don't know what exactly it fell from....
- FrojoS 7y agoYou could increase the average spacing when production slows down.