3 ms·
While I agree that this is technically correct, I feel it ignores the spirit of the project. Since I released it open-source, my expectation is that anyone who
by jstrieb 7y ago
While I agree that this is technically correct, I feel it ignores the spirit of the project.
Since I released it open-source, my expectation is that anyone who cares about safety from takedowns will clone and host one or more of their own. Or, for that matter, use the files offline with shared base-64 encoded URLs
- air7 7y agoIf your site goes down, all the links go broken. To use a clone I'd need to manually copy a part of a dead link and append it on the clone url. The links are actually just data stores in need of a renderer. Why not use an html file instead?