3 ms·
> These hackers, however, were good guys: IT consultants who were frustrated with their hospitality clients’ lax approach to security. To demonstrate the indust
by kingbirdy 7y ago
> These hackers, however, were good guys: IT consultants who were frustrated with their hospitality clients’ lax approach to security. To demonstrate the industry’s weaknesses, their leader arranged for a reporter to tag along on an audit of one of his clients’ hotels. The conditions: The hackers wouldn’t break into the personal devices of hotel guests, and neither the hotel, the city, nor the hackers could be named.
This paragraph could really use more clarity. I can't tell if these guys are authorized pen testers for the hotels, or if they're consultants for other parts of the IT stack who are doing this as gray hats.
- yodon 7y agoThe ambiguity you point out is almost certainly intentional, and reflects well on the reporter. If you were able to identify the details of the hackers' employment, the hotel in question could almost certainly identify their names and employer which would probably not go well for the hackers. There is a reason why journalists protect their sources.