3 ms·

But why not just share the raw text then? In a situation where you would need to distribute web pages without a host, presumably to share vital information, cou

But why not just share the raw text then? In a situation where you would need to distribute web pages without a host, presumably to share vital information, couldn't you just share the raw text via the same medium you use to send the link? I still think this is really interesting though.

_lflx 7y ago
Because you can distribute web forms that post data to locations for aggregation of standardized data. Useful for organizing strikes and other civil disobedience. Think about the tools a modern political campaign uses, it would be somewhat similar.
- JetSpiegel 7y ago
  If you need to have a host receiving that data, why not serve the page from that host?
  - tzakrajs 7y ago
    Good point, I don't know what I was thinking when I wrote that. Perhaps the data from the form could get turned into an email or sms draft instead of an HTTP action.