3 ms·
You're offering up a tabloid source which is ultimately referencing a survey of 11,000 people. >> These studies are hard to find because they get shouted out o
by chachachoney 7y ago
You're offering up a tabloid source which is ultimately referencing a survey of 11,000 people.
>> These studies are hard to find because they get shouted out of the mainstream consciousness.
Abstracts for studies are pretty easy to find on the internet (even the one you mention that is "hard to find").
Are you saying that there are legitimate academic studies which have been deleted? Serious assertions require serious evidence. Do have any beyond a screen shot of a study taken out of context inside a PDF written by a defunct tabloid?
- cheez 7y agoI read the original study, but my google-fu is not good enough to find it.
- justforyou 7y agoSo are they hard to find because they get shouted out of mainstream consciousness, because of insufficient expertise at searching, or because they don't exist?
- cheez 7y agoLet me ask you: had you heard of this very old statistic until now? Why not? Edit: I dusted off my Google-fu and found this: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1854883/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1854883/
- justforyou 7y agoYes. There's nothing intuitively shocking about those results. What exactly is your concern here?
- cheez 7y agoWeird. In one reply you ask me why these studies don't exist, in the next you agree they exist and are not controversial. That is, women are more violent than men. Weird.
- deleted 7y ago[deleted]
- justforyou 7y agoThe only weird thing going on here is you are drawing conclusions not supported by data that your are citing, and intimating systemic suppression where there is none.