> indicators start pointing to nefarious when they use their monopoly status to actively influence politics The actions described in the video sound like thin

> indicators start pointing to nefarious when they use their monopoly status to actively influence politics The actions described in the video sound like things which could easily be an unlawful violation of campaign finance laws, as well. It's a set of serious accusations that deserve a coherent response, not being aggressively muted from the internet (presumably via bogus trade secret accusations).