> it's impossible to extract the value that someone destroys by being a bad leader, from that leader, because shit that breaks is usually far too big. Then you

> it's impossible to extract the value that someone destroys by being a bad leader, from that leader, because shit that breaks is usually far too big. Then you extract everything you can from that "leader" and move on to the next one responsible. Are you saying that Boeing's CEO could smash a couple of planes into some skyscrapers and get away because you can't extract the value from him? Laws also have the deterrence aspect. When you pick up that fat paycheck it comes with the responsibility. Unless you can buy your own justice. Make a list o high ranking executives or politicians that ended up in prison in the US... And don't play with words, knowingly falsifying documents is not "being a bad leader" it's "being a criminal". Here's your idea in a more mundane example: a driver intentionally plows into a crowd killing 2+ people. He can't pay back the damage having a single life to give himself so we'll just blame the car. > If it was possible to get good results by executing executives who fail, wouldn't it follow that some country would have already tried [note: "executing" was your term, mine were prison time and fines] Oh but they did [0]. Just not with local companies in countries with extremely powerful lobby groups, where laws are written by CEOs. So the CEO of a US company like Boeing will never see the inside of a US prison. And since Boeing is so deep in US military contracts, I'm sure pressure will be put on any country that thinks of indicting him. [0] https://www.theverge.com/2017/12/6/16743308/volkswagen-oliver-schmidt-sentence-emissions-scandal-prison https://www.theverge.com/2017/12/6/16743308/volkswagen-olive...