3 ms·
The article pointed out that since ArbCom was the target of the harassment, it couldn’t rule on the case and be seen as neutral. Is this what happened? Maybe.
by jonathankoren 7y ago
The article pointed out that since ArbCom was the target of the harassment, it couldn’t rule on the case and be seen as neutral.
Is this what happened? Maybe. It certainly sounds a plausible, but without any transparency, it’s hard to say.
- eecc 7y agoYeah, but that also comes through as demeaning for the ArbCo; it assumes that once insulted, the members are unable to remain adults and exercise restraint. No, IMHO the central office had already decided the ArbCo had already failed to defend itself and the platform from skilled manipulation. I would expect reforms are on their way