4 ms·
If you have children and then choose to work over doing the legitimately full time job of being a parent (full time being at least 40 hours a week, not that you
by zanny 7y ago
If you have children and then choose to work over doing the legitimately full time job of being a parent (full time being at least 40 hours a week, not that you can't do anything else ever) you need to provide them at least a parent to do that job or else you are neglecting them.
Psychology is pretty uniform in the observation that children need parents, preferably both, but just one is a massive developmental influence. There are minor benefits from they/them being biological but it isn't absolutely necessary, but a care worker, teacher, etc is not filling the same social niche with a child that a parent is. Its a job title in its own right that also has by far the most impact on developing functioning healthy human beings than any other. Its also a job you don't just quit or substitute for without lasting consequences, the role of a parent is to anchor children and provide an immovable stake upon their foundation.
You can absolutely hire a parent if you don't want to or have the time yourself to parent the children you make, but it is substantively harmful to deny them having parent(s) when they need them. If a mother wants to work a full time job while a spouse or even just long term domestic partner? wants to take on the job of being a (or more) parent(s) that works. If a father wants to do the same, that works. But kids still need parent(s), preferably two, and that is two full time positions to fill.
One quandary to think on is that society really doesn't organize or optimize for parental efficiency. We organize schools to lecture and teach to try to balance between quantity of children to a quality of education, but adults are just en masse making new lives and mostly playing it by ear on fulfilling parental responsibilities. We haven't tried to promote good parents to be parents by getting them more children - biological or not - to parent. As a civilization it feels backwards to me how what might be the most important job there is - developing future generations - is the one that is the least recognized for its value and importance. It isn't a career, it isn't prestigious, it isn't treated with the same scrutiny you would want to see in getting your plumbing fixed. But broken pipes are a much less substantive issue than mental malaise or physiological complications brought about by poor or absent parenting in the development of the billions to succeed us.
- aidenn0 7y agoFrom TFA: > They were lovingly cared for by their father, their grandmother, my son’s preschool teacher and my daughter’s babysitter. Sounds like there were at least two family members watching the kids on a regular basis.
- wisty 7y agoIIRC too many caregivers can result in them having issues. If you sleep in 4 different beds you'll never feel at home.
- pferde 7y agoOr perhaps you'll feel comfortable and "at home" anywhere you happen to be. It's very individual.
- lonelappde 7y agoFather, grandmother, school teacher and babysitter is 1 bed, not 4.
- EdwardDiego 7y ago> you need to provide them at least a parent to do that job or else you are neglecting them. When am I neglecting my kids exactly? In the two hours of after school care between school ending and my coming home? You're implying that there's a direct correlation between quantity and quality of parenting, that's a bold claim.
- kspacewalk 7y agoWhen it comes to panting, an important part of quality is quantity. As much as some people want to think that a day filled to the brim with exciting activities is a substitute for a week of near-absence, it's just not. That's not only my experience, but the experience of many of my friends with parents who greatly prioritized their career over spending time with them.
- kspacewalk 7y agoWell I certainly didn't mean "panting"... My bad.