The restitution was exactly equal to the profit (and there was a fine imposed on top of that). If he had made $1m instead of 117k then he would have been made t

The restitution was exactly equal to the profit (and there was a fine imposed on top of that). If he had made $1m instead of 117k then he would have been made to pay back $1m. Your assertion that the restitution structure would have allowed him to pay back less then the amount he profited by is nonsensical.