4 ms·
https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Argumentum_ad_hominem https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Argumentum_ad_hominem
by gravitas 7y ago
https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Argumentum_ad_hominem https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Argumentum_ad_hominem
- cbsmith 7y agoThat wasn't an argument... It was an expression of confusion as to why the author would say what they said.
- ghuntley 7y agoYup.
- pvg 7y agoIt's not. This thing: https://gist.github.com/rjhansen/67ab921ffb4084c865b3618d6955275f#gistcomment-2957376 https://gist.github.com/rjhansen/67ab921ffb4084c865b3618d695... is not an 'expression of confusion', it's an attempt at offtopic shitstirring and mockery. It's kind of dumb in the gist - keeping it up on HN (where it's sensibly forbidden) is worse.
- cbsmith 7y agoSo one person said yup, and the other person said nope. ;-) I agree it served to make the author look a bit foolish.