I understand what you're saying. For sure there's a lot of things wrong with this: - the "scientific" content; - the approval/publishing of the patent based

I understand what you're saying. For sure there's a lot of things wrong with this: - the "scientific" content; - the approval/publishing of the patent based on such content; - the news reporting of such content without further research, just for the sake of being a patent and not questioning it's validity in the light of our current scientific knowledge; - The propagation of such information; If it's deliberate or fruit of a lot of layers of ignorance, we can't know for sure but there's a high probability of both.