Appreciate the correction. I think this is one of those things that I've heard multiple times and for some reason failed to retain; its worth noting that many d

Appreciate the correction. I think this is one of those things that I've heard multiple times and for some reason failed to retain; its worth noting that many dictionaries[1] recognize ignorami as a plural form, independent of the original Latin grammar. I'm usually a bit more of a prescriptivist than is probably rational, but I don't find myself too worked up about this error since the normalization of the error causes no loss of descriptive power (unlike, say, the transition from literally to figuratively). Anyway, thanks again! [1] eg Webster: https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/ignoramus https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/ignoramus