3 ms·
Sure, saying there are ulterior motives to this story is a conspiracy theory. Without, say, video evidence of the author getting handed a bag of money by Bob Sw
by mizzack 7y ago
Sure, saying there are ulterior motives to this story is a conspiracy theory. Without, say, video evidence of the author getting handed a bag of money by Bob Swan you're free to dismissively label it as such.
Without more information we're left with:
- Everything in the WSJ article was known years ago.
- AMD is a week away from likely taking the x86 performance crown from Intel in nearly every metric.
- The last time this happened, Intel engaged in outright illegal non-competitive behavior to preserve market share.
>It's like what Lenin said... you look for the person who will benefit, and, uh, uh... You know what I'm trying to say...
- duxup 7y agoCouldn't you also argue that any bad news about say a politician that comes out would be a conspiracy too as that would be a benefit to someone...?