5 ms·

I think it's been a misunderstanding, because I agree with what you just said.

• Rooster61 7y ago
  > A company that prioritizes human rights at the expense of profit, is a company that has no chance of survival in our political or economic environment > Corporations need consumers so they cannot simply "run afoul of basic human rights" >>Consumers have proven that they are willing to let such things slide to maintain their own convenience time and time again, your example included. The bottom statement is incompatible with the first two. You state that companies will not survive if they do such things. You back that up saying that consumers are them mechanism that keeps them from surviving. My statement directly refutes that. Also, if you don't mind, could you make a record of what was edited in the original post? Ninja edits aren't usually looked on well here on HN.