3 ms·
>This is covered by freedom of speech I think it's a bit presumptuous to go that far. You may believe that it is, but it's hardly an open and shut case, and I'
by EpicEng 7y ago
>This is covered by freedom of speech
I think it's a bit presumptuous to go that far. You may believe that it is, but it's hardly an open and shut case, and I'm pretty sure the SC may have something to add to the discussion should it get that far.
- bitlax 7y agoI was making a clarification, but this is a more or less open forum where people share their opinions. Do I really need to put a disclaimer before every post? Also, the Supreme Court may very well weigh in and may very well be wrong on the law.
- EpicEng 7y ago>but this is a more or less open forum where people share their opinions. Do I really need to put a disclaimer before every post? Not sure I understand; of course it's fine to share your opinion. My opinion is that yours is far too simplistic and completely ignores the nuances that always appear in constitutional cases such as these. >Also, the Supreme Court may very well weigh in and may very well be wrong on the law. Sure... but I'd put more stock in their opinion vs your own.