4 ms·
There has to be a strawman like word for this argument. Last I checked, Jony's products didn't cause Cancer or kill anyone. At worst, all they did was annoy s
by sidcool 7y ago
There has to be a strawman like word for this argument. Last I checked, Jony's products didn't cause Cancer or kill anyone. At worst, all they did was annoy someone.
Your argument would have held credence without that argument.
- viklove 7y ago> "It's nothing as dramatic". Really? Millions of unrepairable wireless earbuds heading to the landfill every year is not dramatic? Yeah, just casually ignore this part of the comment...
- FabHK 7y agoGP is not implying that Apple products are like cancer. He is trying to show that GGP's argument was invalid, by applying to a different case where it obviously doesn't hold. A: "X is not bad, because millions have used and loved it." B: "That doesn't follow. Millions have used and loved Y, and Y is clearly bad, so A's argument doesn't hold." C: "B claims that X is like Y, but Y causes cancer, and X doesn't, so B's argument is invalid." D (me): "No, B doesn't claim that X is like Y, so C's argument is not sound, and B's is valid and sound, and A's is invalid." Or so.