3 ms·
Love or hate big tobacco, millions have used and loved cigarettes. What an argument! "It's nothing as dramatic". Really? Millions of unrepairable wireless earb
by theaeolist 7y ago
Love or hate big tobacco, millions have used and loved cigarettes. What an argument!
"It's nothing as dramatic". Really? Millions of unrepairable wireless earbuds heading to the landfill every year is not dramatic?
- toasterlovin 7y agoApple devices are not physically addictive. Jesus Christ.
- sidcool 7y agoThere has to be a strawman like word for this argument. Last I checked, Jony's products didn't cause Cancer or kill anyone. At worst, all they did was annoy someone. Your argument would have held credence without that argument.
- viklove 7y ago> "It's nothing as dramatic". Really? Millions of unrepairable wireless earbuds heading to the landfill every year is not dramatic? Yeah, just casually ignore this part of the comment...
- FabHK 7y agoGP is not implying that Apple products are like cancer. He is trying to show that GGP's argument was invalid, by applying to a different case where it obviously doesn't hold. A: "X is not bad, because millions have used and loved it." B: "That doesn't follow. Millions have used and loved Y, and Y is clearly bad, so A's argument doesn't hold." C: "B claims that X is like Y, but Y causes cancer, and X doesn't, so B's argument is invalid." D (me): "No, B doesn't claim that X is like Y, so C's argument is not sound, and B's is valid and sound, and A's is invalid." Or so.