4 ms·
> 120% of that, and repeat every six weeks, is the true killer. This is what I try to get through to people - if you consistently deliver at 100%, that becomes
by wastedhours 7y ago
> 120% of that, and repeat every six weeks, is the true killer.
This is what I try to get through to people - if you consistently deliver at 100%, that becomes the baseline and you'll be expected to stretch ever further with little to no extra incentive or support.
Throughout my career I've always held back some level of skill, efficiency, or drive that I can break out as and when required on very particular projects. In the end, it's better for the company as I'm less likely to flame out.
Obviously a lot of companies still operate on visibility and presenteeism over outcomes where it makes it harder, but take the damn lunch break now or you'll never be taking it.
- bassman9000 7y agoI've only recently learnt to step on the breaks to avoid the baseline reset. It's heart breaking to know you're not tapping your whole potential. Before that, every task, every project done, was an invitation to take on the next issue, non stop. People get used to piggyback on that. Pareto distribution is real.