4 ms·
Err? So, suggesting a uniform standard that says hacking is bad is advocating moral relativism? There is no end to this "ends justify the means" crap. "Well, w
by astazangasta 7y ago
Err? So, suggesting a uniform standard that says hacking is bad is advocating moral relativism?
There is no end to this "ends justify the means" crap. "Well, we're the good guys, so it's ok for us to torture, depose governments, nuke civilians, fix elections, assassinate foreign leaders, spy on our citizens..." Etc.
- Veen 7y agoIt doesn't matter whether "we're" the good guys or even if there are any good guys. Where there are groups with different interests there will always be conflict. Given that there will always be conflict, you can choose to do nothing and be out-competed, you can act in the interest of the group to which you belong, or you can act in the interest of the other side. It's possible to argue that these actions are not, in fact, in the interest of your group, but that has nothing to do with some facile Hollywood conception of international relations as good guys vs. bad guys.