5 ms·
A large part of the reason that guns fell out of use on warships was that they were outranged by everything - guns that can shoot up to 40km (like those on the
by DuskStar 7y ago
A large part of the reason that guns fell out of use on warships was that they were outranged by everything - guns that can shoot up to 40km (like those on the Iowa class) aren't enormously useful against destroyers tossing missiles from 200km or strike aircraft from a carrier 400km away. Guns that can shoot down planes and incoming missiles at 100km, though? That's pretty damn useful, even if it doesn't close the distance entirely vs missiles. As for why guns at all - well, guns tend to have magazine depths undreamt of by missiles, and railguns will likely follow that pattern. If moving to railguns for AA defence means you can shoot down 3 or 4 times as many incoming missiles for the same weight, that would be enormous.
And in the fog of war... Who's to say that a DD won't be able to close to railgun range of an enemy warship? Life's a lot easier when you can stay below the horizon, after all!