4 ms·
If the argument is that it's OK because the driver will be there to stop the car from doing something fatally stupid, then that sort of defeats the purpose of n
by bongobongo 7y ago
If the argument is that it's OK because the driver will be there to stop the car from doing something fatally stupid, then that sort of defeats the purpose of not driving the car yourself; this isn't a "self-driving" car, it's glorified cruise control.
- LyndsySimon 7y agoI think the parent was referring to the automated system driving the car as the “driver”, not a human.